Latest
Contact
filmOA v2.0
Stories of survival on sea have been done many times before. But not like in Kon-Tiki, with six English speaking Norwegian men on a wooden raft crossing the Pacific in 1947.
filmOA | out now
Kon-Tiki is a solid film. It’s got a good cast, a pretty solid story and some amazing visuals, especially on water. But there’s one problem with this impressive European film endeavor. And it isn’t even that these Norwegian men are all speaking English — they shot two versions of the film, one in Norwegian and one in English. The problem is timing. There’s no chance a European film like this can compete with the Hollywood imaginary of Life of Pi. But luckily for Kon-Tiki, it doesn’t have to.
Obviously this movie is gonna be compared to Life of Pi. But I’m pretty certain people that enjoyed Life of Pi will also enjoy this film. Other than the setting on sea, it’s a totally different film. It’s a typical survival story. Thor Heyerdahl wants to prove South Americans could’ve crossed the Pacific on a self-developed wooden raft to Polynesia. And what better way to prove this than by doing it himself?
It’s a funny thing. You’re always rooting for these guys, while they’re always the crazies risking their life (and others) just to prove a stupid point. A fact that could’ve been explored a little deeper in the film.
Kon-Tiki is a classic survival film set in the 1940’s with some spectacular visuals. It can easily compete with Life of Pi in entertainment and it never feels like a cheap European alternative. But in the end I fear this film will fade from peoples memories too quickly to leave a mark.
74%
worth the popcorn